Hello, I am a hamster.

fuckingdeviantartstamps:

nice ripple

Well, darn.

Looks like I’ve been stocking up on cat photos, cat reference books, cat breed guides, cat behavior guides, and videos of cat behavior for nothing.

Thanks, OP, for opening my eyes and showing me that I have my own style of drawing cats.

Now, allow me to proceed in making a comic full of stiff, disproportionate felids that display mostly incorrect body language and movements.

themalcontentedwhooligan:

doctorbloodywhoetc:

carrots-areyouinsane:

whovianconfessions:

“Ever since Moffat became the head writer, the show has lost something. It has lost the moral aspect, the spiritual aspect, the aspect that always tried to show something even deeper and more powerful than any Tardis or time vortex. It lost part that Davies built so well, the part that turned the show into a learning experience, not just another television program.”

Are we watching the same show?

…that Davies built…

…that Davies built…

…that Davies built…

This is yet another part of the reason I update less frequently, the vast amount of stupid what-do-you-mean-this-series-existed-before-Davies asshatery in the fandom has begun to take it’s toll on me. Instead of feeling the refreshing rage that once filled me I now feel a sense of apathetic despair whenever I realize how myriad these obnoxious n00blets have become and how they now comprise the majority of people who purport to like my favorite show.

::shakes cane furiously::

Edit: I should note that I have nothing against those who happen to exclusively watch nuWho, or who prefer it to Classic Who, aside from raising a curmudgeonly eyebrow at their personal sense of taste (which is ultimately their business). My spite is rather directed at those who fail to understand or acknowledge that Doctor Who began in 1963 rather than 2005 and who seem to expect it be understood that when that say “Doctor Who” they only wish to examine it in the context of its past six years. If newer fans would simply employ a polite qualifier such as “the new show” or “the revived series” when discussing the show they like, it would really do a lot to lessen my dismissive hated of virtually everything they say about it.

artist-confessions:

It’s true.

Art by http://hinauchi.deviantart.com/

submitted by -fairybone

Okay, I’ll agree that her gallery isn’t incredibly amazing, drizzled with chocolate, and coated in rainbow sprinkles, but it’s definitely above average. I also don’t understand the point of this post (among many others); what exactly is being confessed?

But… the top Hufflepuff crest features an American badger, Taxidea taxus, while the newer crest features a European badger, Meles meles.  Seeing as Hogwarts was founded in 1000 CE, before the official “discovery” of the Americas, let alone the American badger, the Pottermore crest is the more accurate of the two.

The movies used this one:

It depicts a European badger, suggesting that the books’ illustrator did not do much research on badgers, but as the franchise grew, the designers went ahead and looked into this sort of thing.  Either that or fans complained about it.

Then again, the OP’s statement is probably based more on nostalgia than design choices, and nostalgia, nostalgia, and nostalgia makes my point a bit irrelevant.

the-walking-dead-funny:

why so many Ls?!?

“COME BACK IN ONE YEAR!”

whobutnotwho:

Frazer Hines on William Tell

Submitted by the-bluest-ink